If you thought Article 13 is controversial, Article 11 could be more so. It forces search engines and other aggregators to pay license fees on short snippets of content. Google even shared sample search pages back in January which removed the bits that could potentially fall foul of the legislation.

Article 13: A guide to the new EU copyright rules and the ban on memes

Thus citizens of Europe who are against Article 13 are advised to get in touch with their MEPs before this vote. However, more broadly, internet users are What is cardano coin concerned about the impact of the legislation on copied or remixed content. In addition, some argue that the proposal gives no indication about which internet platforms would need to introduce these new filters. To become law, EU member states must pass legislation that adheres to the rules set out in the directive, so it is likely to be some time before the restrictions take effect. There is likely to be a series of campaigns against the changes as well as legal challenges in national and EU courts. The rules are also intended to challenge the power of tech giants like Google and YouTube, forcing them to pay for content they aggregate.

What is the EU Article 13?

The article intends to get news aggregator sites, such as Google News, to pay publishers for using snippets of their articles on their platforms. Press publications “may obtain fair and proportionate remuneration for the digital use of their press publications by information society service providers,” the Directive states. The Directive on Copyright would make online platforms and aggregator sites liable for copyright infringements, and supposedly direct more revenue from tech giants towards artists and journalists. Almost the entirety of the internet thrives on a law called Fair Use.

Ultimately, it all depends how much internet platforms invest in artificial intelligence. If the AI is good enough to work out the difference between a meme and thieving copyrighted material, Article 13 could work. Because the onus will be on individual websites and internet service providers, they will also face the repercussions. As such, some fear that they will aggressively seek to delete content which is potentially troublesome.

How much of an article has to be shared before a platform has to pay the publisher? Boiled down, all this article is saying is that any websites that host large amounts of user-generated content (think YouTube, Twitter and Facebook) are responsible for taking down that content if it infringes on copyright. It’s become known by the most controversial segment, Article 13, which critics claim will have a detrimental impact on creators online. YouTube, and YouTubers, have become the most vocal opponents of the proposal.

What is Article 13? We explain the EU’s new copyright law

1. It’s designed to update the law and make it more relevant to the internet we know and love now, as well as to anticipate change down the line.
2. Copyright laws are intended to encourage the production of content, art, and other media.
3. “Article 13 as written threatens to shut down the ability of millions of people – from creators like you to everyday users – to upload content to platforms like YouTube,” she wrote.
4. But as with the articles above, all of this depends on how the directive is interpreted by member states when they make it into national law.
5. This will affects our ‘Muricans in the United States too, since many sites we use on a daily basis are accessible worldwide.

The video could then be taken down, regardless of whether they had a valid claim, with the creator all but powerless to prevent it. This is one of the reasons to host videos on Vimeo rather than YouTube. After the draft legislation was published, many critics argued the case that the EU’s Article 13 proposal would what to expect from this review be the end of meme culture. By similar logic, popular remix culture would be lost so that could mean the end of user-generated remixes and parodies, and of the platforms that host them like YouTube and SoundCloud. This is a transformative change from the way the internet has developed.

Create your username and password

With such confusion, some creators have instead turned instead to copyright alternatives like copyleft. Copyright differs between countries, with some taking a much harder stance, while others mostly ignore it. The European Union (EU) currently has 28 member states, the UK’s exit—or Brexit—notwithstanding. The blackwell global investments union represents one of the most significant trading blocks in the world, and as such its regulatory framework has worldwide repercussions. However, given that Britain has adopted other European-wide rulings such as General Data Protection Regulation into its own legislation, there’s a chance the same would happen in this case too. These are just some of the possibilities, but because of how vague the law is, it’s hard to see how it might be upheld when the time comes.

“Platforms unable or unwilling to pay licensing fees would need to shut down or disallow users from sharing links with snippets,” said Pirate Party MEP Julia Reda. An organized campaign against Article 13 warns that it’d affect everything from memes to code, remixes to livestreaming. Almost 400,000 people have so far signed a Change.org petition against the provision. Those votes happened just weeks after Europe’s last big piece of internet-related legislation — the General Data Privacy Regulation ( GDPR) — kicked in. Although websites less than three years old, or with less than €10 million annual turnover are exempt, the websites will still need to plan for when those caveats no longer apply to them.

However, member states have up to two years to ratify the directive into law. So it may be a few years yet before the consequences of the legislation are truly known. The European Parliament approved the draft Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market in September 2018. After negotiations, a final proposal was presented to the parliament. While discussions had been taking place since 2012, the election of Jean-Claude Juncker to the presidency of the European Commission saw a renewed interest in reforming copyright law. Juncker’s goal was to implement a Digital Single Market across Europe, in a similar way to the existing physical single market, to enhance the EU’s economic performance.

Like many legal documents, it isn’t immediately clear what that means. Those measures, such as the use of effective content recognition technologies, shall be appropriate and proportionate. It’d force all online platforms to police and prevent the uploading of copyrighted content, or make people seek the correct licenses to post that content.

Both the Copyright Directive and GDPR could dramatically affect and change things about the internet as we know it. But they also differ significantly, not just in scope, but also in how they’re viewed and received by the world beyond Brussels. The EU’s proposed European Copyright Directive is being called a war on memes.

The mathematical theory that made the internet possible

This is the rule that says you can reuse copyrighted material in parodies, research sites like Wikipedia (if attributed properly) and adaptations such as memes. YouTube already has its Content ID system, which can detect copyright-protected music and videos and block them. But critics say developing and implementing this type of filter would be too expensive for small companies or start-ups. Article 13 is the part of the new EU Copyright Directive, external that covers how “online content sharing services” should deal with copyright-protected content, such as television programmes and movies. The EU says it wants to make “copyright rules fit for the digital era”, but not everyone agrees with the proposed changes. The internet is not located in one country, and digital services and data flow seamlessly across borders.

However, critics say the opposite is true, with smaller websites most adversely affected by the directive. On April 15, 2019, the European Council – the political body composed of government ministers from each of the 28 EU member states – voted to adopt into EU law the copyright directive as passed by the European Parliament in March. Six member states (Finland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland and Sweden) voted against adopting the directive while three (Belgium, Estonia and Slovenia) abstained from the vote. This will affects our ‘Muricans in the United States too, since many sites we use on a daily basis are accessible worldwide.

“The onus will be on, for example, the social media platforms to filter their content and ensure that copyright is not breached on their platform,” says Shriane. The final version of Article 13 says services must make “best efforts” to remove copyright-protected videos in cases where “the rights holders have provided… the relevant and necessary information”. Article 13 says content-sharing services must license copyright-protected material from the rights holders. Many of the world’s most popular websites rely on user-generated content. Notably, social media sites like Facebook, Reddit, and Twitter would be affected by the legislation as their platforms depend upon it.

The European Union is trying to pass a hotly debated law on copyright. The European Copyright Directive has been years in the making, and on Tuesday, March 26, the European Parliament is due to vote on the final version of it. It will now be up to the EU’s member states to enact Article 13 and the Copyright Directive. Each country within the EU will be able to interpret the law and how it should be implemented in its own ways. Therefore one country may decide that “upload filters” should be implemented using one tool, while another may understand the law in a different. This is simply a suggestion, with all the foundations of a law, for the governments residing in the EU.